Abstract:
Improving technical efficiency in agriculture can play an important role in meeting present and future demands for agricultural products, at the same time enhancing the long-term sustainability of land and water use. This paper examines the impact of household perceptions of land tenure security on technical efficiency using detailed household-level data collected in Minle County in northwest China. The authors find that the (perceived) tenure security provided by land certificates encourages part-time farming with relatively low technical efficiency. The renting out of land by households with migrant members can only partly make up for this negative effect, because land rental markets are thin and highly fragmented. Therefore, the provision of land certificates to rural households has a negative impact on technical efficiency. For tenure security provided by the expected absence of land reallocations in the near future, on the other hand, the authors find that it reduces temporary migration and thereby contributes to higher technical efficiency.
References
Ahmed, M.M., Gebremedhin, B., Benin, S., and Ehui, S. (2002), ‘Measurement and sources of technical efficiency of land tenure contracts in Ethiopia’, Environment and Development Economics 7(3): 507–527.Google Scholar
Besley, T. (1995), ‘Property rights and investment incentives: theory and evidence from Ghana’, Journal of Political Economy 103(5): 903–937.Google Scholar
Brasselle, A.S., Gaspart, F., and Platteau, J.P. (2002), ‘Land tenure security and investment incentives: puzzling evidence from Burkina Faso’, Journal of Development Economics 67(2): 373–418.Google Scholar
Chand, S. and Yala, C. (2009), ‘Land tenure and productivity: farm-level evidence from Papua New Guinea’, Land Economics 85(3): 442–453.Google Scholar
Chen, P., Yu, M., Chang, C., and Hsu, S. (2008), ‘Total factor productivity growth in China’s agricultural sector’, China Economic Review 19: 580–593.Google Scholar
Chen, Z., Huffman, W.E., and Rozelle, S. (2009), ‘Farm technology and technical efficiency: evidence from four regions in China’, China Economic Review 20(2): 153–161.Google Scholar
Chernina, E., Dower, P., and Markevich, A. (2014), ‘Property rights, land liquidity and internal migration’, Journal of Development Economics 110: 191–215.Google Scholar
Deininger, K. and Jin, S. (2006), ‘Tenure security and land-related investment: evidence from Ethiopia’, European Economic Review 50(5): 1245–1277.Google Scholar
Deininger, K. and Zegarra, E. (2003), ‘Determinants and impacts of rural land market activity: evidence from Nicaragua’ World Development 31(8): 1385–1404.Google Scholar
Deininger, K., Ali, D.A., and Yamano, T. (2008), ‘Legal knowledge and economic development: the case of land rights in Uganda’, Land Economics 84(4): 593–619.Google Scholar
Deininger, K., Jin, S., Xia, F., and Huang, J. (2014), ‘Moving off the farm: land institutions to facilitate structural transformation and agricultural productivity growth in China’, World Development 59: 505–520.Google Scholar
Feder, G. (1988), Land Policies and Farm Productivity in Thailand, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Feng, S. (2008), ‘Land rental, off-farm employment and technical efficiency of farm households in Jiangxi Province, China’, NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 55(4): 363–378.Google Scholar
Feng, S., Heerink, N., Ruben, R., and Qu, F. (2010), ‘Land rental market, off-farm employment and agricultural production in Southeast China: a plot-level case study’, China Economic Review 21(4): 598–606.Google Scholar
Gavian, S. and Ehui, S. (1999), ‘Measuring the production efficiency of alternative land tenure contracts in a mixed crop-livestock system in Ethiopia’, Agricultural Economics 20(1): 37–49.Google Scholar
Guo, Q., Feng, Q., and Li, J. (2009), ‘Environmental changes after ecological water conveyance in the lower reaches of Heihe River, northwest China’, Environmental Geology 58(7): 1387–1396.Google Scholar
Jacoby, H.G., Li, G., and Rozelle, S. (2002), ‘Hazards of expropriation: tenure insecurity and investment in rural China’, American Economic Review 92(5): 1420–1447.Google Scholar
Kumbhakar, S.C., Ghosh, S., and McGuckin, J.T. (1991), ‘A generalized production frontier approach for estimating determinants of inefficiency in US dairy farms’, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 9(3): 279–286.Google Scholar
Ma, X. (2013), ‘Does tenure security matter? Rural household responses to land tenure reforms in northwest China’, PhD thesis, Wageningen University, [Available at] http://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/clc/2044163.Google Scholar
Ma, X., Heerink, N., van Ierland, E., van den Berg, M., and Shi, X. (2013), ‘Land tenure security and land investments in Northwest China’, China Agricultural Economic Review 5(2): 281–307.Google Scholar
Ma, X., Heerink, N., Feng, S., and Shi, X. (2015), ‘Farmland tenure in China: comparing legal, actual and perceived security’, Land Use Policy 42: 293–306.Google Scholar
Ma, X., Heerink, N., van Ierland, E., and Shi, X. (2016), ‘Land tenure insecurity and rural–urban migration in rural China’, Papers in Regional Science 95(2): 383–406.Google Scholar
Mullan, K., Grosjean, P., and Kontoleon, A. (2011), ‘Land tenure arrangements and rural–urban migration in China’, World Development 39(1): 123–133.Google Scholar
Pender, J., Nkonya, E., Jagger, P., Sserunkuuma, D., and Ssali, H. (2004), ‘Strategies to increase agricultural productivity and reduce land degradation: evidence from Uganda’, Agricultural Economics 31(3): 181–195.Google Scholar
Place, F. (2009), ‘Land tenure and agricultural productivity in Africa: a comparative analysis of the economics literature and recent policy strategies and reforms’, World Development 37(8): 1326–1336.Google Scholar
Qu, F., Kuyvenhoven, A., Shi, X., and Heerink, N. (2011), ‘Sustainable natural resource use in rural China: recent trends and policies’, China Economic Review 22(4): 444–460.Google Scholar
Reddy, M. (2002), ‘Implication of tenancy status on productivity and efficiency: evidence from Fiji’, Sri Lankan Journal of Agricultural Economics 4(1): 19–37.Google Scholar
Rozelle, S., Taylor, J.E., and de Brauw, A. (1999), ‘Migration, remittances and agricultural productivity in China’, American Economic Review 89(2): 287–291.Google Scholar
RFOO (Rural Fixed Observation Office), Central Policy Research Division and Agricultural Ministry, P.R. China (2010), National Rural Social Economic Survey Data Collection (2000–2009), Beijing: China Agricultural Press [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Sherlund, S.M., Barrett, C.B., and Adesina, A.A. (2002), ‘Smallholder technical efficiency controlling for environmental production conditions’, Journal of Development Economics 69(1): 85–101.Google Scholar
Shi, X., Heerink, N., and Qu, F. (2011), ‘Does off-farm employment contribute to agriculture-based environmental pollution? New insights from a village-level analysis in Jiangxi Province, China’, China Economic Review 22(4): 524–533.Google Scholar
Tan, S., Heerink, N., Kuyvenhoven, A., and Qu, F. (2010), ‘Impact of land fragmentation on rice producers’ technical efficiency in South-East China’, NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 57(2): 117–123.Google Scholar
Wachong Castro, V., Heerink, N., Shi, X., and Qu, W. (2010), ‘Water savings through off-farm employment?’, China Agricultural Economic Review 2(2): 167–184.Google Scholar
Wang, H.J. and Schmidt, P. (2002), ‘One-step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels’, Journal of Productivity Analysis 18(2): 129–144.Google Scholar
Whalley, J. and Zhang, S. (2007), ‘A numerical simulation analysis of (Hukou) labor mobility restrictions in China’, Journal of Development Economics 83(2): 392–410.Google Scholar
World Bank (2007), World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Heerink, N., Dries, L., and Shi, X. (2013), ‘Water users associations and irrigation water productivity in northern China’, Ecological Economics 95: 12–136.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Glauben, T., and Brümmer, B. (2011), ‘The impact of land reallocation on technical efficiency: evidence from China’, Agricultural Economics 42(4): 495–507.Google Scholar